The Amazing Qur'an
Dr. Gary Miller
the Qur'an amazing is not something done only by Muslims, who have
an appreciation for the book and who are pleased with it; it has
been labeled amazing by non-Muslims as well. In fact, even people
who hate Islam very much have still called it amazing.
thing which surprises non-Muslims who are examining the book very
closely is that the Qur'an does not appear to them to be what they
expected. What they assume is that they have an old book which came
fourteen centuries ago from the Arabian desert; and they expect
that the book should look something like that - an old book from
the desert. And then they find out that it does not resemble what
they expected at all. Additionally, one of the first things that
some people assume is that because it is an old book which comes
from the desert, it should talk about the desert. Well the Qur'an
does talk about the desert - some of its imagery describes the desert;
but it also talks about the sea - what it's like to be in a storm
on the sea.
years ago, the story came to us in Toronto about a man who was in
the merchant marine and made his living on the sea. A Muslim gave
him a translation of the Qur'an to read. The merchant marine knew
nothing about the history of Islam but was interested in reading
the Qur'an. When he finished reading it, he brought it back to the
Muslim and asked, "This Muhammad, was he a sailor?" He was impressed
at how accurately the Qur'an describes a storm on a sea. When he
was told, "No as a matter of fact, Muhammad lived in the desert,"
that was enough for him. He embraced Islam on the spot.
was so impressed with the Qur'an's description because he had been
in a storm on the sea, and he knew that whoever had written that
description had also been in a storm on the sea. The description
of "a wave, over it a wave, over it clouds" (Surah Nur, 24:40) was
not what someone imagining a storm on a sea to be like would have
written; rather, it was written by someone who knew what a storm
on the sea was like. This is one example of how the Qur'an is not
tied to certain place and time. Certainly, the scientific ideas
expressed in it also do not seem to originate from the desert fourteen
centuries before the onset of Muhammad's prophethood, there was
a well-known theory of atomism advanced by the Greek philosopher,
Democritus. He and the people who came after him assumed that matter
consists of tiny, indestructible, indivisible particles called atoms.
The Arabs too, used to deal in the same concept; in fact, the Arabic
word dharrah commonly referred to the smallest particle known to
man. Now, modern science has discovered that this smallest unit
of matter (i.e., the atom, which has all of the same properties
as its element) can be split into its component parts. This is a
new idea, a development of the last century; yet; interestingly
enough, this information had already been documented in the Qur'an
[Surah Saba', 34:3] which states:
[i.e., Allah] is aware of an atom's weight in the heavens and on
the earth and even anything smaller than that..."
fourteen centuries ago that statement would have looked unusual,
even to an Arab. For him, the dharrah was the smallest thing there
was. Indeed, this is proof, that the Qur'an is not outdated.
example of what one might expect to find in an "old book" that touches
upon the subject of health or medicine is outdated remedies or cures.
Various historical sources state that the Prophet (s) gave some
advice about health and hygiene, yet most of these pieces of advice
are not contained in the Qur'an. At first glance, to the non-Muslims
this appears to be a negligent omission. They cannot understand
why Allah would not "include" such helpful information in the Qur'an.
Some Muslims attempt to explain this absence with the following
argument: "Although the Prophet's advice was sound and applicable
to the time in which he lived, Allah, in His infinite wisdom, knew
that there would come later medical and scientific advances which
would make the Prophet's advice appear outdated. When later discoveries
occurred, people might say that such information contradicted that
which the Prophet (s) had given. Thus, since Allah would never allow
any opportunity for the non-Muslims to claim that the Qur'an contradicts
itself or the teachings of the Prophet (s), He only included in
the Qur'an information and examples which could stand the test of
time." However, when one examines the true realities of the Qur'an
in terms of its existence as a divine revelation, the entire matter
is quickly brought into its proper perspective, and the error in
such argumentation becomes clear and understandable.
must be understood that the Qur'an is a divine revelation, and as
such, all information in it is of divine origin. Allah revealed
the Qur'an from Himself. It is the words of Allah, which existed
before creation, and thus nothing can be added, subtracted or altered.
In essence, the Qur'an existed and was complete before the creation
of Prophet Muhammad (s), so it could not possibly contain any of
the Prophet's own words or advice. An inclusion of such information
would clearly contradict the purpose for which the Qur'an exists,
compromise its authority and render it inauthentic as a divine revelation.
there was no "home remedies" in the Qur'an which one could claim
to be outdated; nor does it contain any man's view about what is
beneficial to health, what food is best to eat, or what will cure
this or that disease. In fact, the Qur'an only mentions one item
dealing with medical treatment, and it is not in dispute by anyone.
It states that in honey there is healing. And certainly, I do not
think that there is anyone who will argue with that!
Muhammad (s) and the Qur'an
one assumes that the Qur'an is the product of a man's mind, then
one would expect it to reflect some of what was going on in the
mind of the man who "composed" it. In fact, certain encyclopaedias
and various books claim that the Qur'an was the product of hallucinations
that Muhammad underwent. If these claims are true - if it indeed
originated from some psychological problems in Muhammad's mind -
then evidence of this would be apparent in the Qur'an. Is there
such evidence? In order to determine whether or not there is, one
must first identify what things would have been going on in his
mind at that time and then search for these thoughts and reflections
in the Qur'an.
is common knowledge that Muhammad (s) had a very difficult life.
All of his daughters died before him except one, and he had a wife
of several years who was very dear and important to him, who not
only proceeded him in death but died at a very critical period of
his life. As a matter of fact, she must have been quite a woman
because when the first revelation came to him, he ran home to her,
afraid. Certainly, even today one would have a hard time trying
to find an Arab who would tell you, "I was so afraid that I ran
home to my wife." They just aren't that way. Yet Muhammad (s) felt
comfortable enough with his wife to be able to do that. That's how
influential and strong woman she was. Although these examples are
only a few of the subjects that would have been on Muhammad's mind,
they are sufficient in intensity to prove my point.
Qur'an does not mention any of these things - not the death of his
children, not the death of his beloved companion and wife, not his
fear of the initial revelations, which he so beautifully shared
with his wife - nothing; yet these topics must have hurt him, bothered
him, and caused him pain and grief during periods of his life. Indeed,
if the Qur'an was a product of his psychological reflections, then
these subjects, as well as others, would be prevalent or at least
Approach to the Qur'an
scientific approach to the Qur'an is possible because the Qur'an
offers something that is not offered by other religious scriptures,
in particular, and other religions, in general. It is what scientists
demand. Today there are many people who have ideas and theories
about how the universe works. These people are all over the place,
but the scientific community does not even bother to listen to them.
This is because within the last century the scientific community
has demanded a test of falsification. They say, "If you have theory,
do not bother us with it unless you bring with that theory a way
for us to prove whether you are wrong or not."
a test was exactly why the scientific community listened to Einstein
towards the beginning of the century. He came with a new theory
and said, "I believe the universe works like this; and here are
three ways to prove whether I am wrong!" So the scientific community
subjected his theory to the tests, and within six years it passed
all three. Of course, this does not prove that he was great, but
it proves that he deserved to be listened to because he said, "This
is my idea; and if you want to try to prove me wrong, do this or
is exactly what the Qur'an has - falsification tests. Some are old
(in that they have already been proven true), and some still exist
today. Basically it states, "If this book is not what it claims
to be, then all you have to do is this or this or this to prove
that it is false." Of course, in 1400 years no one has been able
to do "This or this or this," and thus it is still considered true
to you that the next time you get into dispute with someone about
Islam and he claims that he has the truth and that you are in darkness,
you leave all other arguments at first and make this suggestion.
Ask him, "Is there any falsification test in your religion? Is there
anything in your religion that would prove you are wrong if I could
prove to you that it exists - anything?" Well, I can promise right
now that people will not have anything - no test, no proof, nothing!
This is because they do not carry around the idea that they should
not only present what they believe but should also offer others
a chance to prove they're wrong. However, Islam does that.
example of how Islam provides man with a chance to verify it authenticity
and "prove it wrong" occurs in the 4th chapter. And quiet honestly,
I was very surprised when I first discovered this challenge. It
states [Surah An-Nisa, 4:82]:
they not consider the Qur'an? Had it been from any other than Allah,
they would surely have found therein much discrepancy."
is a clear challenge to the non-Muslim. Basically, it invites him
to find a mistake. As a matter of fact, the seriousness and difficulty
of the challenge aside, the actual presentation of such a challenge
in the first place is not even in human nature and is inconsistent
with man's personality. One doesn't take an exam in school and after
finishing the exam, write a note to the instructor at the end saying,
"This exam is perfect. There are no mistakes in it. Find one if
you can!" One just doesn't do that. The teacher would not sleep
until he found a mistake! And yet this is the way the Qur'an approaches
Those Who Have Knowledge
interesting attitude that exists in the Qur'an repeatedly deals
with its advice to the reader. The Qur'an informs the reader about
different facts and then gives the advice: "If you want to know
more about this or that, or if you doubt what is said, then you
should ask those who have knowledge." This too is a surprising attitude.
It is not usual to have a book that comes from someone without training
in geography, botany, biology, etc., who discusses these subjects
and then advises the reader to ask men of knowledge if he doubts
anything. Yet in every age there have been Muslims who have followed
the advice of the Qur'an and made surprising discoveries. If one
looks to the works of Muslim scientists of many centuries ago, one
will find them full of quotations from the Qur'an. These works state
that they did research in such a place, looking for something. And
they affirm that the reason they looked in such and such a place
was that the Qur'an pointed them in that direction.
example, the Qur'an mentions man's origin and then tells the reader,
"Research it!" It gives the reader a hint where to look and then
states that one should find out more about it. This is the kind
of thing that Muslims today largely seem to overlook - but not always,
as illustrated in the following example
years ago, a group of men in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia collected all
of the verses in the Qur'an which discuss embryology - the growth
of the human being in the womb. They said, "Here is what the Qur'an
says. Is it the truth?" In essence, they took the advice of the
Qur'an: "Ask the men who know." They chose, as it happened, a non-Muslim
who is a professor of embryology at the University of Toronto. His
name is Keith Moore, and he is the author of textbooks on embryology
- a world expert on the subject. They invited him to Riyadh and
said, "This is what the Qur'an says about your subject. Is it true?
What can you tell us?"
he was in Riyadh, they gave him all the help that he needed in translation
and all of the cooperation for which he asked. And he was so surprised
at what he found that he changed his textbooks. In fact, in the
second edition of one of his books, called Before We Are Born...
in the section about the history of embryology, he included some
material that was not in the first edition because of what he found
in the Qur'an was ahead of its time and that those who believe in
the Qur'an know what other people do not know.
the pleasure of interviewing Dr. Keith Moore for a television presentation,
and we talked a great deal about this - it was illustrated by slides
and so on. He mentioned that some of the things that the Qur'an
states about the growth of the human being were not known until
thirty years ago. In fact, he said that one item in particular -
the Qur'an's description of the human being as a "leech-like clot"
('alaqah) at one stage [Surahs al-Hajj 22:5; al-Mu'minun 23:14;
and Ghafir 40:67] - was new to him; but when he checked on it, he
found that it was true, and so he added it to his book. He said,
"I never thought of that before," and he went to the zoology department
and asked for a picture of a leech. When he found that it looked
just like the human embryo, he decided to include both pictures
in one of his textbooks.
the aforementioned example of man researching information contained
in the Qur'an deals with a non-Muslim, it is still valid because
he is one of those who is knowledgeable in the subject being researched.
Had some layman claimed that what the Qur'an says about embryology
is true, then one would not necessarily have to accept his word.
However, because of the high position, respect, and esteem man gives
scholars, one naturally assumes that if they research a subject
and arrive at a conclusion based on that research, then the conclusion
Moore also wrote a book on clinical embryology, and when he presented
this information in Toronto, it caused quite a stir throughout Canada.
It was on the front pages of some of the newspapers across Canada,
and some of the headlines were quite funny. For instance, one headline
read: "SURPRISING THING FOUND IN ANCIENT PRAYER BOOK!" It seems
obvious from this example that people do not clearly understand
what it is all about. As a matter of fact, one newspaper reporter
asked Professor Moore, "Don't you think that maybe the Arabs might
have known about these things - the description of the embryo, its
appearance and how it changes and grows? Maybe they were not scientists,
maybe they did some crude dissections on their own - carved up people
and examined these things." The professor immediately pointed out
to him that he [i.e., the reporter] had missed a very important
point - all of the slides of the embryo that had been shown and
that had been projected in the film had come from pictures taken
through a microscope. He said, "It does not matter if someone had
tried to discover embryology fourteen centuries ago. They could
not have seen it!"
of the descriptions in the Qur'an of the appearance of the embryo
are of the item when it is still too small to see with the eye;
therefore, one needs a microscope to see it. Since such a device
had only been around for little more than two hundred years, Dr.
Moore taunted, "Maybe fourteen centuries ago someone secretly had
a microscope and did this research, making no mistakes anywhere.
Then he somehow taught Muhammad (s) and convinced him to put this
information in his book. Then he destroyed his equipment and kept
it a secret forever. Do you believe that? You really should not
unless you bring some proof because it is such a ridiculous theory."
In fact, when he was asked, "How do you explain this information
in the Qur'an?" Dr. Moore's reply was, "It could only have been
of Professor Moore's colleagues, Marshall Johnson, deals extensively
with geology at the University of Toronto. He became very interested
in the fact that the Qur'an's statements about embryology are accurate,
and so he asked Muslims to collect everything contained in the Qur'an
which deals with his speciality. Again people were very surprised
at the findings. Since there are a vast number subjects discussed
in the Qur'an, it would certainly require a large amount of time
to exhaust each subject. It suffices for the purpose of this discussion
to state that the Qur'an makes very clear and concise statements
about various subjects while simultaneously advising the reader
to verify the authenticity of these statements with research by
scholars in those subjects. And as illustrated by the previous examples
of embryology and geology, the Qur'an has clearly emerged authentic.
[Qur'an and Scientific Knowledge]
Did Not Know This Before!
there is an attitude in the Qur'an which is not found anywhere else.
It is interesting how when the Qur'an provides information, it often
tells the reader, "You did not know this before." Indeed, there
is no scripture that exists which makes that claim. All of the other
ancient writings and scriptures that people have do give a lot of
information, but they always state where the information came from.
example, when the Bible discusses ancient history, it states that
this king lived here, this one fought in a certain battle, another
one had so may sons, etc. Yet it always stipulates that if you want
more information, then you should read the book of so and so because
that is where the information came from. In contrast to this concept,
the Qur'an provides the reader with information and states that
this information is something new. Of course, there always exists
the advice to research the information provided and verify its authenticity.
It is interesting that such a concept was never challenged by non-Muslims
fourteen centuries ago. Indeed, the Makkans who hated the Muslims,
and time and time again they heard such revelations claiming to
bring new information; yet, they never spoke up and said, "This
is not new. We know where Muhammad got this information. We learned
this at school." They could never challenge its authenticity because
it really was new!
concurrence with the advice given in the Qur'an to research information
(even if it is new), when 'Umar was caliph, he chose a group of
men and sent them to find the wall of Dhul-Qarnayn. Before the Qur'anic
revelation, the Arabs had never heard of such a wall, but because
the Qur'an described it, they were able to discover it. As a matter
of fact, it is now located in what is called Durbend in the Soviet
The city of Derbend (Durbend, Derbent, Derband) is located in Daghestan
on the West coast of the Caspian sea, about 150 miles south-east
of Grozny, Chechnia and about 140 miles north north-west of Baku,
Azerbaijan. Derband was also known as Bab al-Abwab in early Muslim
history. Al-Tabari mentions it in his famous work 'Tarikh al-rusul
wa'l Muluk' when discussing the events of 14 A.H. (646 C.E.), during
the reign of the second rightly guided Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab
(ra). The city is also mentioned by Yaqut in Mu'jam al-Buldan. It
had fortifications meant to repel invasions from the north of Caucasus,
and where once powerful Kingdom of Khazar ruled. The history of
Khazars has been well documented since the middle of the first millennium
C.E., and their kingdom disintegrated in 966 C.E. Derbend was used
as the main point of entry from the north of Caucasus to the south
into Persian territory.
Yusuf Ali, the famous translator of the meaning of the Qur'an, discusses
some opinions on Dhul Qarnayn (Zul-Qarnain) in Appendix VII at the
end of Sura 'Kahf', the 'Cave". The famous historian Ibn Kathir
mentions that Dhul-Qarnayn was a pious king, who lived during the
time of Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham, pbuh) and he performed the Tawaaf
around the Ka'bah with Prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) when he built it.
See 'Muslim Minorities' site for a Map showing Derbend.]
must be stressed here that the Qur'an is accurate about many, many
things, but accuracy does not necessarily mean that a book is a
divine revelation. In fact, accuracy is only one of the criteria
for divine revelations. For instance, the telephone book is accurate,
but that does not mean that it is divinely revealed. The real problem
lies in that one must establish some proof of the source the Qur'an's
information. The emphasis is in the other direction, in that the
burden of proof is on the reader. One cannot simply deny the Qur'an's
authenticity without sufficient proof. If, indeed, one finds a mistake,
then he has the right to disqualify it. This is exactly what the
a man came up to me after a lecture I delivered in South Africa.
He was very angry about what I had said, and so he claimed, "I am
going to go home tonight and find a mistake in the Qur'an." Of course,
I said, "Congratulations. That is the most intelligent thing that
you have said." Certainly, this is the approach Muslims need to
take with those who doubt the Qur'an's authenticity, because the
Qur'an itself offers the same challenge. And inevitably, after accepting
it's challenge and discovering that it is true, these people will
come to believe it because they could not disqualify it. In essence,
the Qur'an earns their respect because they themselves have had
to verify its authenticity.
essential fact that cannot be reiterated enough concerning the authenticity
of the Qur'an is that one's inability to explain a phenomenon himself
does not require his acceptance of the phenomenon's existence or
another person's explanation of it. Specifically, just because one
cannot explain something does not mean that one has to accept someone
else's explanation. However, the person's refusal of other explanations
reverts the burden of proof back on himself to find a feasible answer.
This general theory applies to numerous concepts in life, but fits
most wonderfully with the Qur'anic challenge, for it creates a difficulty
for one who says, "I do not believe it." At the onset of refusal
one immediately has an obligation to find an explanation himself
if he feels others' answers are inadequate.
fact, in one particular Qur'anic verse which I have always seen
mistranslated into English, Allah mentions a man who heard the truth
explained to him. It states that he was derelict in his duty because
after he heard the information, he left without checking the verity
of what he had heard. In other words, one is guilty if he hears
something and does not research it and check to see whether it is
true. One is supposed to process all information and decide what
is garbage to be thrown out and what is worthwhile information to
be kept and benefited from immediately or even at a later date.
cannot just let it rattle around in his head. It must be put in
the proper categories and approached from that point of view. For
example, if the information is still speculatory, then one must
discern whether it's closer to being true or false. But if all the
facts have been presented, then one must decide absolutely between
these two options. And even if one is not positive about the authenticity
of the information, he is still required to process all the information
and make the admission that he just does not know for sure. Although
this last point appears to be futile, in actuality, it is beneficial
to the arrival at a positive conclusion at a later time in that
it forces the person to at least recognize, research and review
familiarity with the information will give the person "the edge"
when future discoveries are made and additional information is presented.
The important thing is that one deals with the facts and does not
simply discard them out of empathy and disinterest.
real certainty about the truthfulness of the Qur'an is evident in
the confidence which is prevalent throughout it; and this confidence
comes from a different approach - "Exhausting the alternatives."
In essence, the Qur'an states, "This book is a divine revelation;
if you do not believe that, then what is it?" In other words, the
reader is challenged to come up with some other explanation. Here
is a book made of paper and ink. Where did it come from? It says
it is a divine revelation; if it is not, then what is its source?
The interesting fact is that no one has yet come up with an explanation
that works. In fact, all alternatives have bee exhausted. As has
been well established by non-Muslims, these alternatives basically
are reduced to two mutually exclusive schools of thought, insisting
on one or the other.
one hand, there exists a large group of people who have researched
the Qur'an for hundreds of years and who claim, "One thing we know
for sure - that man, Muhammad (s), thought he was a prophet. He
was crazy!" They are convinced that Muhammad (s) was fooled somehow.
Then on the other hand, there is a group which alleges, "Because
of this evidence, one thing we know for sure is that that man, Muhammad
(s) was a liar!" Ironically, these two groups never seem to get
together without contradicting.
fact, many references to Islam usually claim both theories. They
start out by stating that Muhammad (s) was crazy and then end by
saying he was a liar. They never seem to realize that he could not
have been both! For example, if one is deluded and really thinks
that he is a prophet, then he does not sit up late at night planning,
"How will I fool the people tomorrow so that they think I am a prophet?"
He truly believes that he is a prophet, and he trusts that the answer
will be given to him by revelation.
a matter of fact, a great deal of the Qur'an came in answer to questions.
Someone would ask Muhammad (s) a question, and the revelation would
come with the answer to it. Certainly, if one is crazy and believes
that an angel put words in his ear, then when someone asks him a
question, he thinks that the angel will give him the answer. Because
he is crazy, he really thinks that. He does not tell someone to
wait a short while and then run to his friends and ask them, "Does
anyone know the answer?" This type of behaviour is characteristic
of one who does not believe that he is a prophet. What the non-Muslims
refuse to accept is that you cannot have it both ways. One can be
deluded, or he can be a liar. He can br either one or neither one,
but he certainly cannot be both! The emphasis is on the fact that
they are unquestionably mutually exclusive personality traits.
following scenario is a good example of the kind of circle that
non-Muslims go around in constantly. If you ask one of them, "What
is the origin of the Qur'an?" He tells you that it originated from
the mind of a man who was crazy. Then you ask him, "If it came from
his head, then where did he get the information contained in it?
Certainly the Qur'an mentions many things with which the Arabs were
not familiar." So in order to explain the fact which you bring him,
he changes his position and says, "Well, maybe he was not crazy.
Maybe some foreigner brought him the information. So he lied and
told people that he was a prophet." At this point then you have
to ask him, "If Muhammad was a liar, then where did he get his confidence?
Why did he behave as though he really thought he was a prophet?"
Finally backed into a corner, like a cat he quickly lashes out with
the first response that comes to his mind. Forgetting that he has
already exhausted that possibility, he claims, "Well, maybe he wasn't
a liar. He was probably crazy and really thought that he was a prophet."
And thus he begins the futile cycle again.
has already been mentioned, there is much information contained
in the Qur'an whose source cannot be attributed to anyone other
than Allah. For example, who told Muhammad (s) about the wall of
Dhul-Qarnayn - a place hundreds of miles to the north? Who told
him about embryology? When people assemble facts such as these,
if they are not willing to attribute their existence to a divine
source, they automatically resort to the assumption someone brought
Muhammad (s) the information and that he used it to fool the people.
However, this theory can easily be disproved with one simple question:
"If Muhammad (s) was a liar, where did he get his confidence? Why
did he tell some people out right to their face what others could
never say?" Such confidence depends completely upon being convinced
that one has a true divine revelation.
Revelation - Abu Lahab
Muhammad (s) had an uncle by the name of Abu Lahab. This man hated
Islam to such an extent that he used to follow the Prophet around
in order to discredit him. If Abu Lahab saw the Prophet (s) speaking
to a stranger, he would wait until they parted and the would go
to the stranger and ask him, "What did he tell you? Did he say,
'Black'? Well, it's white. Did he say 'morning'? Well, it's night."
He faithfully said the exact opposite of whatever he heard Muhammad
(s) and the Muslims say. However, about ten years before Abu Lahab
died, a little chapter in the Qur'an (Surah al-Lahab, 111) was revealed
about him. It distinctly stated that he would go to the fire (i.e.,
Hell). In other words, it affirmed that he would never become a
Muslim and would therefore be condemned forever. For ten years all
Abu Lahab had to do was say, "I heard that it has been revealed
to Muhammad that I will never change - that I will never become
a Muslim and will enter the Hellfire. Well, I want to become Muslim
now. How do you like that? What do you think of your divine revelation
now?" But he never did that. And yet, that is exactly the kind of
behaviour one would have expected from him since he always sought
to contradict Islam.
essence, Muhammad (s) said, "You hate me and you want to finish
me? Here, say these words, and I am finished. Come on, say them!"
But Abu Lahab never said them. Ten years! And in all that time he
never accepted Islam or even became sympathetic to the Islamic cause.
could Muhammad (s) possibly have known for sure that Abu Lahab would
fulfil the Qur'anic revelation if he (i.e., Muhammad) was not truly
the messenger of Allah? How could he possibly have been so confident
as to give someone 10 years to discredit his claim of prophethood?
The only answer is that he was Allah's messenger; for in order to
put forth such a risky challenge, one has to be entirely convinced
that he has a divine revelation.
example of the confidence which Muhammad (s) had in his own prophethood
and consequently in the divine protection of himself and his message
is when he left Makkah and hid in a cave with Abu Bakr (ra) during
their emigration to Madeenah. The two clearly saw people coming
to kill them, and Abu Bakr was afraid. Certainly, if Muhammad (s)
was a liar, a forger and one who was trying to fool the people into
believing that he was a prophet, one would have expected him to
say in such a circumstance to his friend, "Hey, Abu Bakr, see if
you can find a back way out of this cave." Or "Squat down in that
corner over there and keep quiet." Yet, in fact, what he said to
Abu Bakr clearly illustrated his confidence. He told him, "Relax!
Allah is with us, and Allah will save us!" Now, if one knows that
he is fooling the people, where does one get this kind of attitude?
In fact, such a frame of mind is not characteristic of a liar or
a forger at all.
as has been previously mentioned, the non-Muslims go around and
around in a circle, searching for a way out - some way to explain
the findings in the Qur'an without attributing them to their proper
source. On one hand, they tell you on Monday, Wednesday and Friday,
"The man was a liar," and on the other hand, on Tuesday, Thursday
and Saturday they tell you, "He was crazy." What they refuse to
accept is that one cannot have it both ways; yet they need both
theories, both excuses to explain the information in the Qur'an.
Encounter with a Minister
seven years ago, I had a minister over to my home. In the particular
room which we were sitting there was a Qur'an on the table, face
down, and so the minister was not aware of which book it was. In
the midst of a discussion, I pointed to the Qur'an and said, "I
have confidence in that book." Looking at the Qur'an but not knowing
which book it was, he replied, "Well, I tell you, if that book is
not the Bible, it was written by a man!" In response to his statement,
I said, "Let me tell you something about what is in that book."
And in just three to four minutes, I related to him a few things
contained in the Qur'an. After just those three or four minutes,
he completely changed his position and declared, "You are right.
A man did not write that book. The Devil wrote it!" Indeed, possessing
such an attitude is very unfortunate - for many reasons. For one
thing, it is a very quick and cheap excuse. It is an instant exit
out of an uncomfortable situation.
a matter of fact, there is a famous story in the Bible that mentions
how one day some of the Jews were witnesses when Jesus (pbuh) raised
a man from the dead. The man had been dead for four days, and when
Jesus arrived, he simply said, "Get up!" and the man arose and walked
away. At such a sight, some of the Jews who were watching said disbelievingly,
"This is the Devil. The Devil helped him!" Now this story is rehearsed
very often in churches all over the world, and people cry big tears
over it, saying, "Oh, if I had been there, I would not have been
as stupid as the Jews!" Yet, ironically, these people do exactly
what the Jews did when in just three minutes you show them only
a small part of the Qur'an and all they can say is, "Oh, the Devil
did it. The devil wrote that book!" Because they are truly backed
into a corner and have no other viable answer, they resort to the
quickest and cheapest excuse available. [Jesus ('Isa) and other
Prophets of Allah].
Source of the Qur'an
example of people's use of this weak stance can be found in the
Makkans' explanation of the source of Muhammad's message. They used
to say, "The devils bring Muhammad that Qur'an!" But just as with
every suggestion made, the Qur'an gives the answer. One verse [Surah
Al-Qalam 68:51-52] in particular states:
they say, 'Surely he is possessed [by jinn],' but it [i.e., the
Qur'an] is not except a reminder to the worlds."
it gives an argument in reply to such a theory. In fact, there are
many arguments in the Qur'an in reply to the suggestion that devils
brought Muhammad (s) his message. For example, in the 26th chapter
Allah (SWT) clearly affirms:
evil ones have brought it [i.e., this revelation] down. It would
neither be fitting for them, nor would they be able. Indeed they
have been removed far from hearing." [Surah ash-Shu'ara 26:210-212]
in another place [Surah an-Nahl 16:98] in the Qur'an, Allah (SWT)
when you recite the Qur'an seek refuge in Allah from Shaytan, the
is this how Satan writes a book? He tells one, "Before you read
my book, ask God to save you from me?" This is very, very tricky.
Indeed, a man could write something like this, but would Satan do
this? Many people clearly illustrate that they cannot come to one
conclusion on this subject. On one hand, they claim that Satan would
not do such a thing and that even if he could, God would not allow
him to; yet, on the other hand, they also believe that Satan is
only that much less than God. In essence they allege that the Devil
can probably do whatever God can do. And as a result, when they
look at the Qur'an, even as surprised as they are as to how amazing
it is, they still insist, "The Devil did this!"
be to Allah (SWT), Muslims do not have that attitude. Although Satan
may have some abilities, they are a long way separated from the
abilities of Allah. And no Muslim is a Muslim unless he believes
that. It is common knowledge even among non-Muslims that the Devil
can easily make mistakes, and it would be expected that he would
contradict himself if and when he wrote a book. For indeed, the
Qur'an states [Surah an-Nisa 4:82]:
they not consider the Qur'an? Had it been from other than Allah,
they would surely have found therein much discrepancy."
conjunction with the excuses that non-Muslims advance in futile
attempts to justify unexplainable verses in the Qur'an, there is
another attack often rendered which seems to be a combination of
the theories that Muhammad (s) was crazy and a liar. Basically,
these people propose that Muhammad was insane, and as a result of
his delusion, he lied to and misled people. There is a name for
this in psychology. It is referred to as mythomania. It means simply
that one tells lies and then believes them. This is what the non-Muslims
say Muhammad (s) suffered from. But the only problem with this proposal
is that one suffering from mythomania absolutely cannot deal with
any facts, and yet the whole Qur'an is based entirely upon facts.
Everything contained in it can be researched and established as
true. Since facts are such a problem for a mythomaniac, when a psychologist
tries to treat one suffering from that condition, he continually
confronts him with facts.
example, if one is mentally ill and claims, "I am the king of England,"
a psychologist does not say to him "No you aren't. You are crazy!"
He just does not do that. Rather, he confronts him with facts and
says, "O.K., you say you are the king of England. So tell me where
the queen is today. And where is your prime minister? And where
are your guards?" Now, when the man has trouble trying to deal with
these questions, he tries to make excuses, saying "Uh... the queen...
she has gone to her mother's. Uh... the prime minister... well he
died." And eventually he is cured because he cannot deal with the
facts. If the psychologist continues confronting him with enough
facts, finally he faces the reality and says, "I guess I am not
the king of England."
Qur'an approaches everyone who reads it in very much the same way
a psychologist treats his mythomania patient. There is a verse in
the Qur'an [Surah Yunus 10:57] which states:
mankind, there has come to you an admonition [i.e., the Qur'an]
from your Lord and a healing for what is in the hearts - and guidance
and mercy for the believers."
first glance, this statement appears vague, but the meaning of this
verse is clear when one views it in light of the aforementioned
example. Basically, one is healed of his delusions by reading the
Qur'an. In essence, it is therapy. It literally cures deluded people
by confronting them with facts. A prevalent attitude throughout
the Qur'an is one which says, "O mankind, you say such and such
about this; but what about such and such? How can you say this when
you know that?" And so forth. It forces one to consider what is
relevant and what matters while simultaneously healing one of the
delusions that facts presented to mankind by Allah can easily be
explained away with flimsy theories and excuses.
is this very sort of thing - confronting people with facts - that
had captured the attention of many non-Muslims. In fact, there exists
a very interesting reference concerning this subject in the New
Catholic Encyclopaedia. In an article under the subject of the Qur'an,
the Catholic Church states:
the centuries, many theories have been offered as to the origin
of the Qur'an... Today no sensible man accepts any of these theories!!"
here is the age-old Catholic Church, which has been around for so
many centuries, denying these futile attempts to explain away the
the Qur'an is a problem for the Catholic Church. It states that
it is revelation, so they study it. Certainly, they would love to
find proof that it is not, but they cannot. They cannot find a viable
explanation. But at least they are honest in their research and
do not accept the first unsubstantiated interpretation which comes
along. The Church states that in fourteen centuries it has not yet
been presented a sensible explanation. At least it admits that the
Qur'an is not an easy subject to dismiss. Certainly, other people
are much less honest. They quickly say, "Oh, the Qur'an came from
here. The Qur'an came from there." And they do not even examine
the credibility of what they are stating most of the time.
course, such a statement by the Catholic Church leaves the everyday
Christian in some difficulty. It just may be that he has his own
ideas as to the origin of the Qur'an, but as a single member of
the Church, he cannot really act upon his own theory. Such an action
would be contrary to the obedience, allegiance and loyalty which
the Church demands. By virtue of his membership, he must accept
what the Catholic Church declares without question and establish
its teachings as part of his everyday routine. So, in essence, if
the Catholic Church as a whole is saying, "Do not listen to these
unconfirmed reports about the Qur'an," then what can be said about
the Islamic point of view? If even non-Muslims are admitting that
there is something to the Qur'an - something that has to be acknowledged
- then why are people so stubborn and defensive and hostile when
Muslims advance the very same theory? This is certainly something
for those with a mind to contemplate - something to ponder for those
of an Intellectual
the leading intellectual in the Catholic Church - a man by the name
of Hans - studied the Qur'an and gave his opinion of what he had
read. This man has been around for some time, and he is highly respected
in the Catholic Church, and after careful scrutiny, he reported
his findings, concluding, "God has spoken to man through the man,
Muhammad." Again this is a conclusion arrived at by a non-Muslim
source - the very leading intellectual of the Catholic Church himself!
not think that the Pope agrees with him, but nonetheless, the opinion
of such a noted, reputed public figure must carry some weight in
defence of the Muslim position. He must be applauded for facing
the reality that the Qur'an is not something which can be easily
pushed aside and that, in fact God is the source of these words.
is evident from the aforementioned information, all of the possibilities
have been exhausted, so the chance of finding another possibility
of dismissing the Qur'an is nonexistent.
of Proof on the Critic
the book is not a revelation, then it is a deception; and if it
is a deception, one must ask, "What is its origin? And where does
it deceive us?" Indeed, the true answers to these questions shed
light on the Qur'an's authenticity and silence the bitter unsubstantiated
claims of the unbelievers.
if people are going to insist that the Qur'an is a deception, then
they must bring forth evidence to support such a claim. The burden
of proof is on them, not us! One is never supposed to advance a
theory without sufficient corroborating facts; so I say to them,
"Show me one deception! Show me where the Qur'an deceives me! Show
me, otherwise don't say that it is a deception!"
of the Universe and Life
interesting characteristic of the Qur'an is how it deals with surprising
phenomena which relate not only to the past but to modern times
as well. In essence, the Qur'an is not and old problem. It is still
a problem even today - a problem to the non-Muslims that is. For
everyday, every week, every year brings more and more evidence that
the Qur'an is a force to be contended with - that its authenticity
is no longer to be challenged! For example, one verse in the Qur'an
[Surah al-Anbiya 21:30] reads:
not the unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined
together, then We clove them asunder, and made from water every
living thing? Will they not then believe?"
this very information is exactly what they awarded the 1973 Noble
Prize for - to a couple of unbelievers.
Qur'an reveals the origin of the universe - how it began from one
piece - and mankind continues to verify this revelation, even up
to now. Additionally, the fact that all life originated from water
would not have been an easy thing to convince people of fourteen
centuries ago. Indeed, if 1400 years ago you had stood in the desert
and told someone, "All of this, you see (pointing to yourself),
is made up of mostly water," no one would have believed you. Proof
of that was not available until the invention of the microscope.
They had to wait to find out that cytoplasm, the basic substance
of the cell, is made-up of 80% water. Nonetheless, the evidence
did come, and once again the Qur'an stood the test of time
on Falsification Test
reference to the falsification tests mentioned earlier, it is interesting
to note that they, too, relate to both the past and the present.
Some of them were used as illustrations of Allah's omnipotence and
knowledge, while others continue to stand as challenges to the present
day. An example of the former is the statement made in the Qur'an
about Abu Lahab. It clearly illustrates that Allah, the Knower of
the Unseen, knew that Abu Lahab would never change his ways and
accept Islam. Thus Allah dictated that he would be condemned to
the Hellfire forever. Such a chapter was both an illustration of
Allah's divine wisdom and a warning to those who were like Abu Lahab
of the Book
interesting example of the latter type of falsification tests contained
in the Qur'an is the verse which mentions the relationship between
the Muslims and the Jews. The verse is careful not to narrow its
scope to the relationship between individual members of each religion,
but rather, it summarizes the relationship between the two groups
of people as a whole. In essence, the Qur'an states that the Christians
will always treat the Muslims better than the Jews will treat the
Muslims. Indeed, the full impact of such a statement can only be
felt after careful consideration of the real meaning of such a verse.
It is true that many Christians and many Jews have become Muslims,
but as a whole, the Jewish community is to be viewed as an avid
enemy of Islam. Additionally, very few people realize what such
an open declaration in the Qur'an invites. In essence, it is an
easy chance for the Jews to prove that the Qur'an is false - that
it is not a divine revelation. All they have to do is organize themselves,
treat the Muslims nicely for a few years and then say, "Now what
does your holy book say about who are your best friends in the world
- the Jews or the Christians? Look what we Jews have done for you!"
That is all they have to do to disprove the Qur'an's authenticity,
yet they have not done it in 1400 years. But, as always, the offer
still stands open!
of the examples so far given concerning the various angles from
which one can approach the Qur'an have undoubtedly been subjective
in nature; however, there does exist another angle, among others,
which is objective and whose basis is mathematical.
is surprising how authentic the Qur'an becomes when one assembles
what might be referred to as a list of good guesses. Mathematically,
it can be explained using guessing and prediction examples. For
instance, if a person has two choices (i.e., one is right, and one
is wrong), and he closes his eyes and makes a choice, then half
of the time (i.e., one time out of two) he will be right. Basically,
he has a one in two chance, for he could pick the wrong choice,
or he could pick the right choice.
if the same person has two situations like that (i.e., he could
be right or wrong about situation number one, and he could be right
or wrong about situation number two), and he closes his eyes and
guesses, then he will only be right one-fourth of the time (i.e.,
one time out of four). He now has a one in four chance because now
there are three ways for him to be wrong and only one way for him
to be right. In simple terms, he could make the wrong choice in
situation number one and then make the wrong choice in situation
number two; or he could make the wrong choice in situation number
one and then make the right choice in situation number two; or he
could make the right choice in situation number one and then make
the wrong choice in situation number two; or he could make the right
choice in situation number one and then make the right choice in
situation number two.
course, the (only instance in which he could be totally right is
the last scenario where he could guess correctly in both situations.
The odds of his guessing completely correctly have become greater
because the number of situations for him to guess in have increased;
and the mathematical equation representing such a scenario is ½
x ½ (i.e., one time out of two for the first situation multiplied
by one time out of two for the second situation).
on with the example, if the same person now has three situations
in which to make blind guesses, then he will only be right one-eighth
of the time (i.e., one time out of eight or ½ x ½ x ½ ). Again,
the odds of choosing the correct choice in all three situations
have decreased his chances of being completely correct to only one
time in eight. It must be understood that as the number of situations
increase, the chances of being right decrease, for the two phenomena
are inversely proportional.
applying this example to the situations in the Qur'an, if one draws
up a list of all of the subjects about which the Qur'an has made
correct statements, it becomes very clear that it is highly unlikely
that they were all just correct blind guesses. Indeed, the subjects
discussed in the Qur'an are numerous [some of them are listed in
the Qur'an and Scientific Knowledge], and thus the odds of someone
just making lucky guesses about all of them become practically nil.
If there are a million ways for the Qur'an to be wrong, yet each
time it is right, then it is unlikely that someone was guessing.
following three examples of subjects about which the Qur'an has
made correct statements collectively illustrate how the Qur'an continues
to beat the odds.
the 16th chapter (Surah an-Nahl 16:68-69) the Qur'an mentions that
the female bee leaves its home to gather food. Now, a person might
guess on that, saying, "The bee that you see flying around - it
could be male, or it could be female. I think I will guess female."
Certainly, he has a one in two chance of being right. So it happens
that the Qur'an is right. But it also happens that that was not
what most people believed at the time when the Qur'an was revealed.
Can you tell the difference between a male and a female bee? Well,
it takes a specialist to do that, but it has been discovered that
the male bee never leaves his home to gather food. However, in Shakespeare's
play, Henry the Fourth, some of the characters discuss bees and
mention that the bees are soldiers and have a king. That is what
people thought in Shakespeare's time - that the bees that one sees
flying around are male bees and that they go home and answer to
a king. However, that is not true at all. The fact is that they
are females, and they answer to a queen. Yet it took modern scientific
investigations in the last 300 years to discover that this is the
back to the list of good guesses, concerning the topic of bees,
the Qur'an had a 50/50 chance of being right, and the odds were
one in two.
addition to the subject of bees, the Qur'an also discusses the sun
and the manner in which it travels through space. Again, a person
can guess on that subject. When the sun moves through space, there
are two options: it can travel just as a stone would travel if one
threw it, or it can move of its own accord. The Qur'an states the
latter - that it moves as a result of its own motion (Surah al-Anbiya
21:33). To do such, the Qur'an uses a form of the word sabaha to
describe the sun's movement through space. In order to properly
provide the reader with a comprehensive understanding of the implications
of this Arabic verb, the following example is given.
a man is in water and the verb sabaha is applied in reference to
his movement, it can be understood that he is swimming, moving of
his own accord and not as a result of a direct force applied to
him. Thus when this verb is used in reference to the sun's movement
through space, it in no way implies that the sun is flying uncontrollably
through space as a result of being hurled or the like. It simply
means that the sun is turning and rotating as it travels. Now, this
is what the Qur'an affirms, but was it an easy thing to discover?
Can any common man tell that the sun is turning? Only in modern
times was the equipment made available to project the image of the
sun onto a tabletop so that one could look at it without being blinded.
And through this process it was discovered that not only are there
spots on the sun but that these spots move once every 25 days. This
movement is referred to as the rotation of the sun around its axis
and conclusively proves that, as the Qur'an stated 1400 years ago,
the sun does, indeed, turn as it travels through space.
returning once again to the subject of good guesses, the odds of
guessing correctly about both subjects - the sex of bees and the
movement of the sun - are one in four!
as back fourteen centuries ago people probably did not understand
much about time zones, the Qur'an's statements about this subject
are considerably surprising. The concept that one family is having
breakfast as the sun comes up while another family is enjoying the
brisk night air is truly something to be marvelled at, even in modern
time. Indeed, fourteen centuries ago, a man could not travel more
than thirty miles in one day, and thus it took him literally months
to travel from India to Morocco, for example. And probably, when
he was having supper in Morocco, he thought to himself, "Back home
in India they are having supper right now." This is because he did
not realize that, in the process of traveling, he moved across a
time zone. Yet, because it is the words of Allah, the All-Knowing,
the Qur'an recognizes and acknowledges such a phenomenon.
an interesting verse it states that when history comes to an end
and the Day of Judgement arrives, it will all occur in an instant;
and this very instant will catch some people in the daytime and
some people at night. This clearly illustrates Allah's divine wisdom
and His previous knowledge of the existence of time zones, even
though such a discovery was non-existent back fourteen centuries
ago. Certainly, this phenomenon is not something which is obvious
to one's eyes or a result of one's experience, and this fact, in
itself, suffices as proof of the Qur'an's authenticity.
one final time to the subject of good guesses for the purpose of
the present example, the odds that someone guessed correctly about
all three of the aforementioned subjects - the sex of bees, the
movement of the sun and the existence of time zones - are one in
one could continue on and on with this example, drawing up longer
and longer list of good guesses; and of course, the odds would become
higher and higher with each increase of subjects about which one
could guess. But what no one can deny is the following: the odds
that Muhammad (s), an illiterate, guessed correctly about thousands
and thousands of subjects, never once making a mistake, are so high
that any theory of his authorship of the Qur'an must be completely
dismissed - even by the most hostile enemies of Islam!
the Qur'an expects this kind of challenge. Undoubtedly, if one said
to someone upon entering a foreign land, "I know your father. I
have met him," probably the man from that land would doubt the newcomer's
word, saying, "You have just come here. How could you know my father?"
As a result, he would question him, "Tell me, is my father tall,
short, dark, fair? What is he like?" Of course, if the visitor continued
answering all of the questions correctly, the sceptic would have
no choice but to say, "I guess you do know my father. I don't know
how you know him, but I guess you do!"
situation is the same with the Qur'an. It states that it originates
from the One who created everything. So everyone has the right to
say, "Convince me! If the author of this book really originated
life and everything in the heavens and on the earth, then He should
know about this, about that, and so on." And inevitably, after researching
the Qur'an, everyone will discover the same truths. Additionally,
we all know something for sure: we do not all have to be experts
to verify what the Qur'an affirms. One's iman (faith) grows as one
continues to check and confirm the truths contained in the Qur'an.
And one is supposed to do so all of his life.
God (Allah) guide everyone close to the truth.
engineer at the University of Toronto who was interested in psychology
and who had read something on it, conducted research and wrote a
thesis on Efficiency of Group Discussions. The purpose of his research
was to find out how much people accomplish when they get together
to talk in groups of two, three, ten, etc. The graph of his findings
goes up and down at places, but it reaches the highest point at
the variable of two. The findings: people accomplish most when they
talk in groups of two. Of course, this discovery was entirely beyond
his expectations, but it is very old advice given in the Qur'an
[Surah Saba 34:46]:
'I exhort you to one thing - that you stand for Allah, [assessing
the truth] by twos and singly, and then reflect...'"
the 89th chapter of the Qur'an [Surah al-Fajr 89:7] mentions a certain
city by the name of 'Iram (a city of pillars), which was not known
in ancient history and which was non-existent as far as historians
were concerned. However, the December 1978 edition of National Geographic
introduced interesting information which mentioned that in 1973,
the city of Elba was excavated in Syria. The city was discovered
to be 43 centuries old, but that is not the most amazing part. Researchers
found in the library of Elba a record of all of the cities with
which Elba had done business. Believe it or not, there on the list
was the name of the city of 'Iram. The people of Elba had done business
with the people of 'Iram!
conclusion I ask you to consider with care the following [Surah
they say, 'Why are not signs sent down to him from his Lord?' Say,
'Indeed, the signs are with Allah, and I am but a clear warner.'
But it is sufficient for them that We have sent down to you the
Book [i.e., Qur'an] which is rehearsed to them? Verily, in that
is mercy and a reminder to people who believe."
Allah is the proper name in Arabic for The One and Only God, The
Creator and Sustainer of the universe. It is used by the Arab Christians
and Jews for the God (Eloh-im in Hebrew; 'Allaha' in Aramaic, the
mother tongue of Jesus, pbuh). The word Allah does not have a plural
or gender. Allah does not have any associate or partner, and He
does not beget nor was He begotten. SWT is an abbreviation of Arabic
words that mean 'Glory Be To Him.'s or pbuh: Peace Be Upon Him.
This expression is used for all Prophets of Allah.ra: Radiallahu
Anhu (May Allah be pleased with him).
Holy Qur'an," Text, Translation and Commentary by Abdullah Yusuf
Ali, 1934. (Latest Publisher: Amana Publications, Beltsville, MD,
USA; Title: "The Meaning of the Holy Qur'an," 1992). Includes subject
Meaning of the Glorious Koran," An Explanatory Translation by Mohammed
Marmaduke Pickthall, a Mentor Book Publication. (Also available
as: "The Meaning of the Glorious Koran," by Marmaduke Pickthall,
Dorset Press, N.Y.; Published by several publishers since 1930).
Bible, The Qur'an and Science (Le Bible, le Coran et la Science),"
The Holy Scriptures Examined in the Light of Modern Knowledge, by
Maurice Bucaille, English version published by North American Trust